AI coding tools like Cursor are incredibly powerful — but how you prompt them determines whether you get a clean 5-line fix or a 500-line rewrite.
This guide explains how to reduce tokens, reduce cost, and improve output quality by tightening your prompts and controlling context.
CORE RULE
Smaller context + tighter instructions = cheaper and better results
Large prompts = more analysis = more tokens = slower + noisier responses.
INPUT TOKEN SAVING (What YOU Send)
These techniques reduce how much context the AI has to read.
1️⃣ Select Only the Relevant Code
Send only what needs to change.
❌ Bad: Improve validation in this file
✅ Good: Improve validation in this function
2️⃣ Avoid Repeating Architecture Every Time
Don’t restate your stack repeatedly.
Put these in Cursor Rules instead.
❌ We are using Next.js app router with hooks and services…
✅ Follow project rules. Refactor this hook.
3️⃣ Don’t Paste Logs Unless Necessary
Logs are extremely token-heavy.
❌ Full build log
✅ Only the error message + related code
4️⃣ Start New Chats for New Tasks
Old chat history is reprocessed every time.
New feature?
➡️ Start a new chat
5️⃣ Don’t Open Unrelated Files
Cursor reads open tabs as context.
Close things like:
-
Config files
-
Large JSON files
-
Constants files
-
Unrelated components
Less open context = cheaper and more focused responses.
6️⃣ Use References Instead of Explanations
Don’t describe architecture if the AI can follow patterns.
❌ We have a folder where services call APIs and hooks manage state…
✅ Follow existing services folder pattern
7️⃣ Scope the Change Clearly
Broad prompts increase analysis tokens.
❌ Improve this component
✅ Add loading and error state to this hook only
OUTPUT TOKEN SAVING (What AI Sends Back)
Now we control how much the AI writes.
8️⃣ Ask for Code Only
Biggest output saver.
Use phrases like: Code only. No explanation.
9️⃣ Ask for Minimal Changes
Prevents full rewrites.
Modify existing code, don’t rewrite
Return only the updated function
Limit Refactor Scope
❌ Rewrite this page using best practices
✅ Refactor API logic into a separate service
1️⃣1️⃣ Don’t Ask for Teaching Mode Unless Needed
Explanations can be 2–3× longer than code.
Only when learning: Explain why this bug happens
Otherwise: Fix only
1️⃣2️⃣ Control Verbosity Explicitly
You can directly instruct response size:
-
Short answer
-
Minimal code
-
No comments
WORKFLOW HABITS THAT SAVE A LOT
These habits reduce repeated token waste over time.
1️⃣3️⃣ Iterate Instead of Regenerate
If the result is 80% correct:
❌ Regenerate
✅ Keep everything same, just fix the API error handling
1️⃣4️⃣ Use Edits, Not Generations
Editing existing code uses fewer tokens than generating new files.
Prefer: Modify this component
Over: Create a new improved version
1️⃣5️⃣ Avoid “Best Practices” Prompts
This triggers long explanations and rewrites.
❌ Improve this using best practices
✅ Extract API call into service function
1️⃣6️⃣ Don’t Ask for Documentation by Default
Docs produce large outputs.
❌ Document this code
✅ Add short JSDoc comment
Final Takeaway
Good prompting isn’t about being polite — it’s about being precise and restrictive.
If you remember only one pattern, use this:
Fix with minimal change. Code only.
That one line alone can cut token usage dramatically while keeping diffs clean and review-friendly.